Settle an argument: klingon intellect.
My friend and I are having an argument as to whether klingons are stupid or not, or if they're particular perceptive with strong wills.
This has to do with providing a bonus or penalty to a stat.
My argument is that klingons are not, generally, stupid and are on par with humans in terms of intelligence. Their aggressiveness and tendancy to fly into a blind rage may make them do stupid things, like charging a group of people using phasers with nothing but a d'k tahg, but that is a result of their uncontrollable battle lust, not because they're dumb.
Klingons are very artistic and creative people, as expressed through their religion, stratified codes of honour, decorations and clothing styles, weapon and ship designs, and opera. They have a rich cultural heritage which would not be the case if they were, in general, below human average intelligence.
But my friend argues that they are very strong willed and their tendancy for religion makes them all wise, insightful and perceptive. I say this has more to do with their culture than any inherent ability, and that in fact, their impulsiveness and aggressiveness would mean they were less wise than an average human.
All this translates to giving a character, at character creation, a bonus or penalty. My friend says there should be a penalty to Intelligence and Wisdom should either be average or get a bonus. I argue that Intelligence should stay average and Wisdom get a penalty.
What do you think?