Question about the errata

I'm working on PG errata 2.1 (which is mostly just a couple of FAQs that have been sitting in my inbox for a few months now), and about to start NG errata 2.0.

Yeah, I know. I must be some sort of masochistic idiot. Or dedicated beyond the point of madness. Or both.

Anyway, the question I have (because I'm a little insecure sometimes) is this: Is it worth it to anybody? Has the PG errata actually helped anybody with their game? It's a lot of time out of my life, and if nobody's getting any use out of it, there are other things I could be doing.

I think it does, especially if it is formatted in a readable manner (which it's not so much when in a thread post format). I am grateful for your work.

I've already been using some of your new errata for the PG, Patrick, so I'd have to say definitely yes.

Well, as long as someone is getting some use out of it, then I'll keep it up. It's worth the effort if it's helping any of the players out there.

Actually, Patrick, I'm curious about what happened to the original Player's Guide errata, without all the Coda 2.0 modifications? Has the thread been de-stickied, or has it been removed all together?

I don't have the time to deal with learning the changes you folks inserted for Coda 2.0.

I use them all the time.
I'm curious to see the errata of all other books as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sea Tyger

Actually, Patrick, I'm curious about what happened to the original Player's Guide errata, without all the Coda 2.0 modifications? Has the thread been de-stickied, or has it been removed all together?

I don't have the time to deal with learning the changes you folks inserted for Coda 2.0.

---

The errata thread was simply unstuck.

But the changes Patrick made were actually not that major (at least, that's my opinion...) :)