Re: The Face of Armageddon
Quote:
Originally posted by ghosty
Personally I think the Federation would have thrown the rulebook out the window a long time ago. Total war and survival has a way of changing societies.
I agree in principle, but I think it is the principles of the Federation that got them into such trouble with the Klingons to start with.
Still you make a good point, so I concede. And I agree the Cardies would be with-holding their top ships, until an ambitious Gul named Dukat convinced them that keeping the Federation strong would be better than having the Klingons knocking on their doors. :)
Re: Re: The Face of Armageddon
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain Zymmer
I agree the Cardies would be with-holding their top ships, until an ambitious Gul named Dukat convinced them that keeping the Federation strong would be better than having the Klingons knocking on their doors. :)
Or a Federation that can be taken advantage of after the war due to its weakness.
On the other issues I've seen flying around:
The Federation-Klingon war, the one that ran through TOS and the movie era ended with the signing of the Khitomer Treaty (STVI)...this began a period of declining tensions between old enemies.
Narenda III was the turning point for Fed/Klingon relations, in that the heroics of the Enterprise-C showed the Klingons that the Federation could be honourable and noble which led to the alliance between the two powers.
The failure by the Enterprise-C in the Yesterday's Enterprise to reach Narenda III probably showed the Klingons that the Federation were cowards who couldn't be trusted which slowly degenerated into war.