Printable View
Shukran, Jess...Quote:
Originally posted by Jesse Heinig
People who have had issues with the existing character sheets will be happy to know that the sheets included in the Starfleet Operations Manual are no longer in color and have a white background. Hopefully we'll be able to put them up in PDF format for easy printing. (Sadly, couldn't do anything about the small box spaces for specializations -- no room!)
J.H.
Issues isn't really the word...more like seething dislike :)Quote:
Originally posted by Jesse Heinig
People who have had issues with the existing character sheets will be happy to know that the sheets included in the Starfleet Operations Manual are no longer in color and have a white background. Hopefully we'll be able to put them up in PDF format for easy printing. (Sadly, couldn't do anything about the small box spaces for specializations -- no room!)
J.H.
still haven't gotten my ref screen yet :(
Allen
Finally got mine! (along with the BtVSRPG core book :D )
Two minor quibbles I'd say:
- The Narrator's side is a bit dark. Legible, well organized (different colors for each type of table is a nice idea), but why use such a dark background. I don't know about you, but it's often a bit dark where/when we play, and this is not going to make it easy for my poor eyes (it is a usually accepted ergonomic fact that dark fonts on a light background are less stressful to read). Well, minor quibble really, I don't read what's on my part of the screen all that often ;) .
- Matt finish on the player's side ... somehow, the picture is just gorgeous, and I feel the finish do not do it justice. A nice glossy one would have been great ... and maybe more resilient to all those things my players use to throw at me ;) . Mind you, maybe I can do something about it ... any idea about how to make a glossy finish?
- Oh, a third one maybe :) ... a small scenario instead of those gorgeously useless character sheets would have been a good idea.
That said, I'm rather happy with my purchase: It'll be quite useful and it's really nice to look at (specially compared to these LUG's ... things).
Which tables are wrong? Where would I find the correct versions?
See the original posting in this thread - comments near the end about "non-errata'd versions". I'm assuming the versions in the errata strands on this site are the corrected versions.