Starfleet #1

Printable View

10-24-2005, 03:43 PM
TFVanguard

Starfleet #1

And 'lo, it was compiled...

Starfleet #1: Ships of the Constitution Era, Vol 1

Includes write-ups and information on the Constitution, Saladin, Hermes, Capella, Sherman, Independence, Derf, Nelson, Bonaventure, Larson, Anton, Wayfarer, Loknar, Longbow, Decatur, Surya, and Federation Classes.

Whew!

Also includes quick registry range guide, size comparison chart, CODA and rough FASA notes, and a sheet of hexagonal counters for the ships within the guide.

And, most importantly, it's FREE! That's definately the best part about it...
10-24-2005, 05:20 PM
Pericles

Downloaded and worked fine for me.
10-24-2005, 05:21 PM
First of Two

My first impression is that this is cool. :cool:
10-24-2005, 05:31 PM
Brian K

:cool:

Thanks for this. Looks really great.

Brian K
10-24-2005, 05:55 PM
BouncyCaitian

Woot! downloaded :D
10-24-2005, 06:30 PM
Troy_Of_Borg

Wow, nice job :D .
10-25-2005, 05:02 AM
Pantoufle

indeed good job ;)
10-25-2005, 06:01 AM
Phoenix

I don't play CODA or FASA and I still think this is superb work!

But what happened to the Ptolemy class Tug, Washington Class Heavy Carrier, Hellespont Class Destroyer, Burke Class Destroyer, Somnulus Class Fast Hospital ship, Akula Class Destroyer, and the Marco Polo Class...Explorer?
10-25-2005, 07:01 AM
TFVanguard

Glad everyone likes!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

But what happened to the Ptolemy class Tug, Washington Class Heavy Carrier, Hellespont Class Destroyer, Burke Class Destroyer, Somnulus Class Fast Hospital ship, Akula Class Destroyer, and the Marco Polo Class...Explorer?

Several of these will appear in the next compilation. Though I haven't 100 percent settled on this yet, Book #2 will have a focus for modular transports (due to the added rules involved). There's a surprising number of pods out there, that there are...

The various carriers and fighters will come later, natch. :)

I'm going to exercize creative license with the Taurus and Marco Polo as well.. and just assume that they weren't... drawn adequately for each design. :)
10-26-2005, 07:21 PM
The Tatterdemalion King

What program are the ships done in?
10-26-2005, 07:34 PM
AslanC

Nice work... congrats
10-26-2005, 08:08 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by C. Huth

What program are the ships done in?

Paint Shop Pro, actually... nothing fancy, it's cheap and works well. :)
10-26-2005, 08:25 PM
The Tatterdemalion King

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFVanguard

Paint Shop Pro, actually... nothing fancy, it's cheap and works well. :)

Hmm, damn... i was hoping there'd be vector data to use.
10-26-2005, 08:54 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by C. Huth

Hmm, damn... i was hoping there'd be vector data to use.

Well... there is.. some.. but I really keep the vectors only for the primaries and do a lot of pixel editing for looks.
10-27-2005, 09:23 PM
The Tatterdemalion King

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFVanguard

Well... there is.. some.. but I really keep the vectors only for the primaries and do a lot of pixel editing for looks.

Ahh... still, i don't know how well that'd convert to illustrator.
10-29-2005, 07:46 PM
Sho-sa Kurita

IIIIIIIIII like it! Good work. One suggestion -- the little tab on the right-hand pages that says "Constitution"? Since you're indicating a timeframe, not a ship class, consider changing it to "Consitution Era."
10-29-2005, 08:53 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sho-sa Kurita

IIIIIIIIII like it! Good work. One suggestion -- the little tab on the right-hand pages that says "Constitution"? Since you're indicating a timeframe, not a ship class, consider changing it to "Consitution Era."

The other tabs are 'NX', 'Daedalus', 'Armstrong', 'Baton Rouge', 'Constitution (R)', 'Excelsior', 'Ambassador', 'Galaxy', 'Soveriegn' ... so, with that in mid, makes it a bit more clear, right? :)
10-30-2005, 12:06 AM
Sho-sa Kurita

It's not so much that is was unclear. I guess it's just a preference. You've got a ship-class name at the top of the page for the write-up, and then another ship-class name for the era on the side of the page...

Other than that personal issue :) I really like the layout. Simple and clean, and the covers are very nice.
10-30-2005, 01:05 PM
Phoenix

Why not just change it to the date, date range, or Circa 2360's?
10-30-2005, 02:25 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Why not just change it to the date, date range, or Circa 2360's?

You wanna know why?!

I'll tell you why!!!

THE FARGIN' OBERTH!!!!

Damn the Oberth! From hell's heart I stabbeth thee!

Erm, sorries. Actually, I grouped the ships by technology level. The Revenge class, for instance, wouldn't be built until 2380, but it's using tech that's from the 2280's.
10-30-2005, 03:02 PM
Phoenix

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFVanguard

You wanna know why?!

I'll tell you why!!!

THE FARGIN' OBERTH!!!!

Damn the Oberth! From hell's heart I stabbeth thee!

TFVanguard let me introduce you to a concept...it's called Decaf :D
Really, based on the tech level makes sense. In my own break downs of Star Fleet I had given names to the ship "generations" so to speak. There not as refined or populated as yours however.

Ah, just for the heck of it here's my era list:
Pre-Federation (2050-2160’s) (Valent - NX)
Generation 1 (2150-2240’s) “The Beginning” (Daedalus)
Generation 2 (2230-60’s) “The Awakening” (Connie)
Generation 3 (2270-2310’s) “The First Expansion” (Refit Connie)
Generation 4 (2290-2330’s) “The Great Experiment” (Obirth, Excelsior)
Generation 5 (2320-2350’s) “The Second Expansion” (Springfield, Wambandu, lots of the lost ships mentioned but never seen)
Generation 6 (2330-2360’s) “The Peace Initiative” (Ambassador, Olympic)
Generation 7 (2350-2370’s) “The Next Generation” (Galaxy, Nebula)
Generation 8 (2360’s on) “Perimeter Defense Action” (Akira, Intrepid)
Generation 9 (2370’s on) “Post Dominion Designs” (Nova, Soverign)

And as you noticed there is some over lap in the tech area.
10-30-2005, 09:30 PM
AslanC

http://www.kiosek.com/oberth/
11-02-2005, 02:16 PM
Modem

When you do Vol. 2 of TOS

Can I suggest:
http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery10/ja_pioneer.htm

It's not a bad design, it looks like it would fit in either early 'Connie'-era, or just refore refitting began...my guess anyway, YMMV:)
11-02-2005, 03:14 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

TFVanguard let me introduce you to a concept...it's called Decaf :D

Yeah yeah, but why is the Oberth around even in DS9? I mean, it seemed a bit hopeless in the 2280s, much LESS 100 years later. Why would there be so many? (Yes, I know the 'real' reason, but it's not good enough). Coupled with the size issues and the performance issues, it's just.. gah... just a frustrating bastard, really.
11-02-2005, 03:20 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Modem

Can I suggest:
http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery10/ja_pioneer.htm

It's not a bad design, it looks like it would fit in either early 'Connie'-era, or just refore refitting began...my guess anyway, YMMV:)

You know, if it were a TMP-era ship, I would just throw it into the 'scrapyard fleet' pile, where it would make the most sense. As a TOS ship, I'm really - really iffy on this one. The overall lines are doable, but all those little 'greeblies' really turn the thing into the dreaded 'space dragster', particularly on the primary hull.

The 'rear scanners' harken to SFB and the tech manual, but we know those aren't scanners anymore...

I might do a 'clean hull' version of it, but, I dunno.. there's a lot of points on this ship that I'm really hesistant to work on, accordingly... just too many 'space dragster' bits all over it. :S
11-02-2005, 03:29 PM
Captain Blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFVanguard

Yeah yeah, but why is the Oberth around even in DS9? I mean, it seemed a bit hopeless in the 2280s, much LESS 100 years later. Why would there be so many? (Yes, I know the 'real' reason, but it's not good enough). Coupled with the size issues and the performance issues, it's just.. gah... just a frustrating bastard, really.

I got yer back on this one.
____

Were they ever called Oberth class in TNG/DS9? I can't remember (and I'm too cheap to spend that much on the DVDs and go look for myself).

Could we use a scaling issue thing kinda like the old FASA TNG Officers Manual by creating the Sagan class?

It looks just like the Oberth (same model for tv), but it's bigger, heartier, and generally more useful. I mean, after all, if there can be like 4300 different sized of the Klingon bird of prey model...

Alex
11-02-2005, 03:58 PM
TFVanguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Blake

Were they ever called Oberth class in TNG/DS9? I can't remember (and I'm too cheap to spend that much on the DVDs and go look for myself).

As far as I know, the class name was never said on screen, but a couple of dedication plaques did indeed say 'Oberth'. Granted, the SFX came seperately from the bridge redresses, so it's possible that, at the time (the Tsicho..ts.. the russian one) may have originally meant to be a new class completely that was /retconned/ into the Oberth. (Neither Oberth nor Miranda were official class names until TNG was on the air...)

Quote:

Could we use a scaling issue thing kinda like the old FASA TNG Officers Manual by creating the Sagan class?

I'm actually not going ot bother. I don't really mind the Oberth's size except for the hull connections, and that only needs a little tweaking up to make it work. The Sagan, to me, could be an 'upgraded' Oberth - but the 'magnify the hull' concept is just plain dumb. I'll chalk it to bad VFX.

Quote:

It looks just like the Oberth (same model for tv), but it's bigger, heartier, and generally more useful. I mean, after all, if there can be like 4300 different sized of the Klingon bird of prey model...

*shudder*

Something I'm not looking forward to when I do a Galaxy-Era Klingon book.
11-02-2005, 03:59 PM
Doug Burke

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Blake

Were they ever called Oberth class in TNG/DS9? I can't remember (and I'm too cheap to spend that much on the DVDs and go look for myself).

The Oberth name was coined for TNG. They never named the class in ST3.