Printable View
The StarShip creation program is ready
Go to
http://www.simsherbrooke.com/strpg/ship_creation
and create your own Starship encyclopedia!!!
This is the version 1.01
And you can print your creation but not saving it!
The version 1.2 coming soon with the possibility of 'saving/loading'
I hope that you will like !
Theko
I tried to make a fast cout, and it wouldn't let me set the # of shuttle bays to less than 1 :(
Definitely like what I see here... this'll help greatly with all the canon ships I don't have yet.
One minor thing though... the missile weapon menu's a bit off, in that you have a Type III missile weapon available (there isn't one in the rules) and there's no Type VI in there.
MAC
Because it cost 0. Just wait until the resume page appear ans edit it to 0...Quote:
Originally posted by MightyCthulhu
I tried to make a fast cout, and it wouldn't let me set the # of shuttle bays to less than 1 :(
The final page is fully editable..
theko
this would be corrected soon...Quote:
Originally posted by Mac417
Definitely like what I see here... this'll help greatly with all the canon ships I don't have yet.
One minor thing though... the missile weapon menu's a bit off, in that you have a Type III missile weapon available (there isn't one in the rules) and there's no Type VI in there.
MAC
And on p 141 (narrator guide) of Missile weapon cost table, the type III is availabe... it's type IV that is omited.. but i think this is an not deliberate omission. :confused:
Theko
I think this is great!
One question - would it be possible to have an option to have the notes section in English?
The text in the section 'notes' is LOREM IPSUM. In brief it is phony (text which should be replaced by the user).Quote:
Originally posted by deltabob
I think this is great!
One question - would it be possible to have an option to have the notes section in English?
I'm going to remove it!
Loving this creator thus far, but (and I SINCERELY hate being a naysayer on such a cool program) I got a couple more nitpicks...
First, and this may just be my net provider, do the schematic pics usually have a problem loading up?
Second, I noticed that the finished sheet doesn't have a field for Sensors.
Still, I'm in utter love of this piece of work. Nice job, dude.
--Mac
You are absolutely right, the field to sensor is missing. I will work to this at once to set this small problem... (sorry for that! :eek: )Quote:
Originally posted by Mac417
Loving this creator thus far, but (and I SINCERELY hate being a naysayer on such a cool program) I got a couple more nitpicks...
First, and this may just be my net provider, do the schematic pics usually have a problem loading up?
Second, I noticed that the finished sheet doesn't have a field for Sensors.
Still, I'm in utter love of this piece of work. Nice job, dude.
--Mac
For the images... I noticed that if the images are too often changed, the program no longer update the fields (seems to be the Flash Mx engine)
if that occur, change the page setting to The "klingon" one and go back to the original, then the image field suppose to work.
The corrected version is now avalaible
Theko
I have to say that I think this is one of the coolest tools I've seen in a long time. Rock freaking on!
I really hope this gets updated for the new Starships book. Gawd I so could have used a tool like this when building all those ships (by hand)!
Great job! :D
I believe to have answered you by e-mail! :)Quote:
Originally posted by Don Mappin
I have to say that I think this is one of the coolest tools I've seen in a long time. Rock freaking on!
I really hope this gets updated for the new Starships book. Gawd I so could have used a tool like this when building all those ships (by hand)!
Great job! :D
But in brief, here is my answer: (cut and paste from the email)
It pleases me that you appreciate my work. And yes I intend to improve it.
I will put the new rules as soon as the book appear on the market.
The update to come:
-Save and load.
-More Starship pictures
-Ships edge and flaw specific programation
-Fenrengi, Romulan, Cardasian and aliens(other species) Output pages.
I am develloping a new software called "Stellar Cartography" A map of the galaxy, by sector, with all the solar systems... It is ended at 50 %.
I will warn you as soon as it will be ended.
Theko
Great program can't wait to see the update. One nitpick, in the weapons section under beams you have a type called Cuting Beam. This should probably be Cutting. Keep up the good work.
OK it's cutting ... (I'm french and In French "cutting" would have taken one " t ")Quote:
Originally posted by rook111
Great program can't wait to see the update. One nitpick, in the weapons section under beams you have a type called Cuting Beam. This should probably be Cutting. Keep up the good work.
it will be corrected today!
Thanks
A great tool!
Just one small nitpick: I just tried to create a Nova-class Surveyor and the program came up with the maneuver modifiers for a frigate.
Personaly I tend to use the Scout/Aux classification from table 9.14 NG for most ships that don't fall into any other category (including surveyors), but of course YMMV.
I noticed that when you buy the Ablative Armor edge, your ship's structure does not increase by 5 points. I believe it should (followed by the Ablative Armor +5 note?)
I also noticed that when you buy extra transporters, it seems to add them one at a time for 1 point. If I understood the errata on this, I thought you get half the ship's size in transporters free and half the ship's size again for each point you spend.
Allen
Quote:
Originally posted by AllenS
I noticed that when you buy the Ablative Armor edge, your ship's structure does not increase by 5 points. I believe it should (followed by the Ablative Armor +5 note?)
I also noticed that when you buy extra transporters, it seems to add them one at a time for 1 point. If I understood the errata on this, I thought you get half the ship's size in transporters free and half the ship's size again for each point you spend.
Allen
The edge and flaw don't alter ship specs. you must do it yourself...for now! but i'm suppose to update this in a futur version.
I cannot trust errata not officially published by Decipher. For the moment, you can any time modify the stats of your vessels, when sheet is create, to reach your expectations.
Theko
Theko:
I think the Errata in the Sticky Topic posted on this board will eventually turn out to be the exact items Decipher puts on its website... but perhaps Doug or Ross would care to comment?
Charles
I made the tour of subject. No mention of errata on ships but a lot of suggestion have been made but nothing official.
In all the cases, I saw nothing!
Theko
:confused:
When a classification is not listed, the software puts the general classification (frigate) However, I believes too that the surveyor should be in Scout/Aux.Quote:
Originally posted by Lancer
A great tool!
Just one small nitpick: I just tried to create a Nova-class Surveyor and the program came up with the maneuver modifiers for a frigate.
Personaly I tend to use the Scout/Aux classification from table 9.14 NG for most ships that don't fall into any other category (including surveyors), but of course YMMV.
I am going to modify the program today.
Actually, Theko, I think you might wanna leave the Surveyor type separate. I was working on a Nova myself, working off my copy of Spacedock, and the Nova's size was out of the support/auxiliary's Size range (which also means I had to deviate a bit from Spacedock, as the Nova's classified as a research/lab ship in there).
Oh, something else concerning weapons. The offense values of all the ship's weapons are added together to come up with the reliability rating for all the weapons. I think the program just adds the beam weapon OVs and missile weapon OVs separately.
--Mac