FAC-1
Offense: 3
Space: 3
Min. Size: 3
FAC-2
Offense: 4
Space: 5
Min. Size: 4
FAC-3
Offense: 5
Space: 6
Min. Size: 5
Pen. Chart
Offense
1-9 : 2/2/2/0/0
10-14: 3/3/3/0/0
15-34: 4/4/4/0/0
35-5 9: 5/5/5/0/0
60-109: 6/6/6/0/0
110 and up: 7/7/7/0/0
FAC-1
Offense: 3
Space: 3
Min. Size: 3
FAC-2
Offense: 4
Space: 5
Min. Size: 4
FAC-3
Offense: 5
Space: 6
Min. Size: 5
Pen. Chart
Offense
1-9 : 2/2/2/0/0
10-14: 3/3/3/0/0
15-34: 4/4/4/0/0
35-5 9: 5/5/5/0/0
60-109: 6/6/6/0/0
110 and up: 7/7/7/0/0
"Always beware of anything said by a person with a smile." -Cronan-sama
http://www.cronan-memorial.com
http://sites.google.com/site/memoryeta
Initially Trek, but haphazard Archival Site, no need to make it a Wiki.
http://web.archive.org/web/200410151.../ssd/ssds.html
Don Miller's SSDs for Star Fleet Battles are here, axing the URL past sfb takes you to the main site.
What exatcly are these? And where did you get the idea from? Are they to be mounted on Starships or Spacestations or are they meant to be ground based (planetary) defense installments?
Accelerator Cannons are weapons used on Federation ships before the invention of photon torpedoes in the FASA game. Enterprise has of course thrown that concept right out the window. But as low-tech missile weapons that would fall between Spatial Torps and Photon Torps the stats seem about right on first glance.
"And all I ask is a tall ship, and a star to steer her by."
"Though a cloaking device, pulsed phaser cannons
and a full load of quantum torpedoes would be quite nice too."
Ah, FasaTrek. That is a blank point in my knowledge of Star Trek RPG. Thanks for the pointerOriginally Posted by Identity Crisis
![]()
Accelerator cannons are nukes put through a special energizing process in
an advanced launcher.
And f##k ENT, FASA's tech tree makes a lot more sense to me. the ships are actually primitive earlier on, and the Klingons actually do not have torps before the 2260s.
"Always beware of anything said by a person with a smile." -Cronan-sama
http://www.cronan-memorial.com
http://sites.google.com/site/memoryeta
Initially Trek, but haphazard Archival Site, no need to make it a Wiki.
http://web.archive.org/web/200410151.../ssd/ssds.html
Don Miller's SSDs for Star Fleet Battles are here, axing the URL past sfb takes you to the main site.
Thot they meant mass drivers. But massdriver fired nuclear war heads makea certain form of sense, really.
What did they use as torpedos?
A brave little theory, and actually quite coherent for a system of five or seven dimensions -- if only we lived in one.
Academician Prokhor Zakharov, "Now We Are Alone"
Hmm I'm not sure how much sense a mass driver would make, especially in light of Enterprise: While I agree Enterprise did crap on a lot of old material, most of that was just made-up fan stuff, like FasaMass drivers still do need to have quite a large amount of mass to work, and they are only going to work if you have a very straight line of sight.. It would be fine for orbital bombardment, as is the point of mass drivers, but for Starship combat it wouldn't work. While Nuclear missiles are powerful weapons, they don't work the same in space, without air or mass to dislace in a shockwave, so a near miss would just be a miss...
Ta Muchly