Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 89

Thread: Game Over for Decipher?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    445
    Originally posted by Tobian
    Well ding dong the witch is dead
    Heh. I just have this picture of Don and Warren Holland - Don in the blue-checked dress, black gloss shoes (and glasses and beard), Holland in the black cape and hat; Don tosses the water on the offending miscreant, and - "I'm melting! I'm melting!" (as last glob is erased from existence) "What a world, what a world..."

    I was thinking about it a bit while driving home from work today; the license would have reverted back to Paramount/Viacom as of Jan. 1, '06 in any case - so in less than half a year, the right to finally, for the luvva Gawd, get some kind of material back on the shelves would have been a possibility no matter what

    I wonder if - should the speculated implosion actually occur - the Decipher corporate population would end up posting their experiences in a thread on RPG.net, as the ex-LUG/Decipher RPG design crew did following the division's untimely demise. If so, I would be very interested to have the veil of corporate bullspeak and secrecy finally pulled aside, and the real story of the nightmarish management behind that place finally laid bare for all to see. Most entertaining.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heavy Metal Universe
    Posts
    1,147
    I'm afraid that, given the atmosphere surrounding Trek at Paramount ("Trek needs a rest" - yeah, sure, but it needed that five years ago, not NOW!), they would pull the plug on RPGs as well without realizing that it is a way to have the franchise survive in the hearts of fans (and "give it back" to them as said... who? Moore? don't remember). I just hope that doesn't happen.

    I would dream to see more ICON or CODA, but if it goes the way of WotC, I'm afraid we'll see D20... Ah, if it is finely done like B5 or Spycraft, I wouldn't be bothered.

    How much I would like to hear Dec's management now, and the whole story. Damn it's about time the company pays for its errors.

    However, I'm very sorry for Dec's employees, victims of this mismanagement.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Expanded Spacecraft Operations, a 100+ page sourcebook for CODA Trek

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Kaunakakai, Molokai, Hawaii, USA
    Posts
    4,020

    Talking

    As much the gamer in me want WotC to get it, my half Ferengi/Hutt business mind tells me they should decline. In fact, the sadistic monster in me want Paramount to beg that WotC take the license and Charles Ryan refuses them. It would be a sweet revenge toward Paramount for their undermining back in 2000.
    Anyhoo, just some random thoughts...

    "My philosophy is 'you don't need me to tell you how to play -- I'll just provide some rules and ideas to use and get out of your way.'"
    -- Monte Cook

    "Min/Maxing and munchkinism aren't problems with the game: they're problems with the players."
    -- excerpt from Guardians of Order's Role-Playing Game Manifesto

    A GENERATION KIKAIDA fan

    DISCLAIMER: I Am Not A Lawyer

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    3,462
    Quote Originally Posted by D.S.McBride
    Heh. I just have this picture of Don and Warren Holland - Don in the blue-checked dress, black gloss shoes (and glasses and beard), Holland in the black cape and hat; Don tosses the water on the offending miscreant, and - "I'm melting! I'm melting!" (as last glob is erased from existence) "What a world, what a world..."
    What have I told you about having fantasies of Don in a gingham dress!! Just hope he doesn't have a penguin hand puppet with glowing red eyes

    I am also sorry for deciphers employees too, but then they MAY get out of the woods yet. I think they should have franchised out the RPG products, but I suspect they were too greedy to share profit, so instead they cut off their nose to spite their face. I guess it doesn't really affect us Trek Coda users (Now, since it's long since been ruined for us), but it's a shame for the LotR's, because they were teased with new material, and even got one.. what will happen to them now? Hmm At least for Trek-RPG the game has been in te hands of the fans for some time now, and what we have is pretty good.. Lets get craching on those netbooks! It's just a shame we can't get them printed out to hard cover
    Ta Muchly

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Waco, Texas
    Posts
    201
    Personally I think they should've gone the pdf route with the books they had promised but hadn't come out yet (mirror, klingon, etc).
    Anyone who still uses Frames for a website should be shot.
    Does your sig area really need to be bigger then your post?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heavy Metal Universe
    Posts
    1,147
    Yes. They would have sold them. Sold them good. Got some money. To help stay afloat.

    What kind of a management is this? (Oh sorry, has the question been asked already? )

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Expanded Spacecraft Operations, a 100+ page sourcebook for CODA Trek

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canton, IL USA
    Posts
    112
    Mabye Eden Studios could do Trek RPG.

    They do a great job with Buffy & Angel.

    Just a idea.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    Posts
    2,090
    ::looks around, nods at what he sees::

    Karma is finally taking a hand. 'Bout damn time.
    Last edited by Doug Burke; 08-12-2005 at 08:44 AM.
    Former Decipher RPG Net Rep

    "Doug, at the keyboard, his fingers bleeding" (with thanks to Moriarti)

    In D&D3E, Abyssal is not the language of evil vacuum cleaners.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208
    Quote Originally Posted by REG
    As much the gamer in me want WotC to get it, my half Ferengi/Hutt business mind tells me they should decline. In fact, the sadistic monster in me want Paramount to beg that WotC take the license and Charles Ryan refuses them. It would be a sweet revenge toward Paramount for their undermining back in 2000.
    I think WOTC is more focused on their own properties. If anyone was going to take on Trek, I'd guess it would be the Mongoose or Green Ronin.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    3,804
    Sigh and once again no word on RPGs. Screw him... screw him right in his ear!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by Ineti
    I think WOTC is more focused on their own properties. If anyone was going to take on Trek, I'd guess it would be the Mongoose or Green Ronin.
    Mongoose it would seem would be problematic as don't the have a number of licenses already? Let see ... in RPG: D20/OGL, Judge Dredd (2002), Conan (2003), Babylon 5 (2003), the "XP" edition of Paranoia (2004), Jeremiah (2005), Munson Rift War (2005) and Miniatures: Starship Troopers
    Granted the D20/OGL cost nothing at this time. Trek and LOTR would be pretty hefty licensing fees. Given that Mongoose did Rift War in D20, it would not be very likely that they would want to do Trek and LOTR in CODA. Of course Mongoose is know for their may typos.

    Green Ronin -- they have only licensed Thieves World.

    Hopefully we can have it dual stated.
    Member, TrekRPGnet Development Team | OD&D Guild - The Guild for Original (Classic) D&D | FlintGamers |Free Web Hosting

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    3,462
    I am not sure exactly what constitutes a liscence or such, but green Ronin are also doing Warhammer at the moment, which has quite an agressive release schedule.

    I can't see either of those two jumping in to the liscence. In many ways it made sense for Decipher to take on the roleplaying liscence, because it had the card one, but it's just a shame it was.. Decipher, and not another more competent company *sigh*. it would be horribly costly, because Paramount will still be over what it wants to do with Startrek.. On the one hand it's got a good reputation and millions of fans, on the other, it's dead in the water, as a franchise, so where to pitch the cost?!
    Ta Muchly

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    Posts
    2,090
    Quote Originally Posted by AslanC
    Sigh and once again no word on RPGs. Screw him... screw him right in his ear!
    You almost sound surprised, Aslan... Me, not so much. I'm thinking that even anger might be wasted...
    Former Decipher RPG Net Rep

    "Doug, at the keyboard, his fingers bleeding" (with thanks to Moriarti)

    In D&D3E, Abyssal is not the language of evil vacuum cleaners.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by Ineti
    Uh...yeah...

    If ou're in suck bloody good shape, where's Worlds ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •