Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 89 of 89

Thread: Game Over for Decipher?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Kaunakakai, Molokai, Hawaii, USA
    Posts
    4,020
    Quote Originally Posted by AslanC
    I think the idea of the Prime Directive folks taking over Star Trek RPGs would be a disaster. While they produce a lot of stuff for thier own line, look closely at the quality of the work. It is somewhat comic booky and childish.

    They missed the entire point of Star Trek and are simply the most developed of the "cool ships and lots of fights" camp.
    Meh. Merely cosmetic. They just needed to update their art staff (like hire Owen Oulton) and take advantage of the stock images from Paramount. Perhaps they should hire on Don Mappin to be the RPG developer.
    Anyhoo, just some random thoughts...

    "My philosophy is 'you don't need me to tell you how to play -- I'll just provide some rules and ideas to use and get out of your way.'"
    -- Monte Cook

    "Min/Maxing and munchkinism aren't problems with the game: they're problems with the players."
    -- excerpt from Guardians of Order's Role-Playing Game Manifesto

    A GENERATION KIKAIDA fan

    DISCLAIMER: I Am Not A Lawyer

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    3,804
    I have stuck by Prime Directive from the first edition and frankly IMHO their writing is basic and shows no understanding of the Star Trek higher concepts. Even FASA got a better handle on them, IMHO again.

    But you are right their layout is ass.

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Kaunakakai, Molokai, Hawaii, USA
    Posts
    4,020
    Quote Originally Posted by AslanC
    I have stuck by Prime Directive from the first edition and frankly IMHO their writing is basic
    Basic? It took me and my group two years before we realized that Wild Weasels is effective OUTSIDE the ship (and that bummed us out).

    Sorry, you were referring to Prime Directive, not them Captain's Rulebook for Star Fleet Battles. Trust me, there's nothing basic about their boardgame rules text.


    Quote Originally Posted by AslanC
    and shows no understanding of the Star Trek higher concepts. Even FASA got a better handle on them, IMHO again.
    As I said before, SFB and Star Trek are two different realities. Maybe TFG (and now ADB) should have gotten better RPG designers because I doubt they're good in that area, where their field of expertise lie with the strategy boardgame.

    If SFB show any higher concept beyond their militaristic wargame feel, then something is wrong.
    Anyhoo, just some random thoughts...

    "My philosophy is 'you don't need me to tell you how to play -- I'll just provide some rules and ideas to use and get out of your way.'"
    -- Monte Cook

    "Min/Maxing and munchkinism aren't problems with the game: they're problems with the players."
    -- excerpt from Guardians of Order's Role-Playing Game Manifesto

    A GENERATION KIKAIDA fan

    DISCLAIMER: I Am Not A Lawyer

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by PGoodman13
    I wonder if Decipher has considered releasing the books they have finished (and presumably approved) as print-on-demand PDFs at, say, RPGnow.com? I've bought a couple of these over the years, and the quality is quite good. Interiors wouldn't be full color, but I could certainly live with that. Hell, I could live with them just being released as PDF, without the POD potential. I can take the sucker to Kinko's to get it bound if I really need to.
    You would think so, considering that Decipher is listed as doing business with and by Publishing Services, Inc. which it seem owns DriveThruRPG.com. DriveThruRPG.com of course is PDF only at this time.
    Member, TrekRPGnet Development Team | OD&D Guild - The Guild for Original (Classic) D&D | FlintGamers |Free Web Hosting

  5. #80
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Canyon, TX, USA, Sol III
    Posts
    1,783
    I'd rather they didn't go through DriveThruRPG because I don't like watermarks in my books, but I could live with it, I suppose.
    Patrick Goodman -- Tilting at Windmills

    "I dare you to do better." -- Captain Christopher Pike

    Beyond the Final Frontier: CODA Star Trek RPG Support

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    889

    Lightbulb

    Before Decipher's forum goes down, anyone that post on Decipher's forums might want to indicate that if they don't know about trekRPGnet that they should check us out in case Decipher shuts down its forums. Stick a link to us in your signature if you can.

    Think about previous statements made by Don that they were making money on the Star Trek RPG books seems to indicate that Decipher is highly leveraged thus needing to make more money per book. With 3 warehouses seems to indicate product was backing up in the warhouse. Granted Decipher was started up Fan, Inc. to manage a number of official fan clubs (Star Trek & LOTR) and to launch some unoffical fan clubs, it still seems like alot of space.
    Member, TrekRPGnet Development Team | OD&D Guild - The Guild for Original (Classic) D&D | FlintGamers |Free Web Hosting

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    349

    Exclamation From what I understand...

    It wasn't just the Trek RPGs that were the problem, the L.O.T.R. RPGs, and the card games weren't/aren't moving that well either.

    Then that lead to the fiscal problem, like tournament winners not getting their cash prizes.

    Also, Dec. got rid of two of their warehouses (they only have one now), as well as staff (writing and art). Net result here: products missing/cancelled/never-seeing-light-of-day. And if said products were ordered, the retailer is promised to have it made up in 'other products'...which is just what you WANT to hear; the old 'bait and switch'.

    I think this was a damd shame: They (Dec.) had a great opprotunity thrust into their hands by Par. and Dec. fumbled it, almost at the kickoff. I keep thinking about 'what could have been':
    A) Miniatures and rules for them: Another round of be un-Engaged , and NO SHIPS, NO (BETTER) 'LITTLE MEN'...this sucks...
    B) More source material: 'Blood and Honor' (Klingons), 'Through the Mirror Darkly'(the Dark Mirror universe), and 'the Peacekeeper Handbook' (Security and Diplomats)...I was gonna buy these...but now; never the light of day will hit...
    C) Online support: I'm not talking the Dec. website (though that WOULD'VE been nice), I'm talking: Imaging a sourcebook for the oncoming online game...being able to translate what 'on-screen' to 'pen-and-paper'...this could have been cool
    ...and that's about the time it hit the fan...

    Truisms I know:
    1) Marvel is NOT better than DC (nor should EVERYTHING be ‘ULTIMITED’),
    2) D20 is NOT the best gaming system out there (nor should EVERYTHING be ‘crammed’ into it),
    3) And No matter how ‘THEY’ dress it up, Regardless of how ‘THEY’ title it, and even if ‘THEY’ say “BASED ON…”; “ENTERPRISE” IS NOT STAR TREK!!!
    4) 'Reality' T.V. ain't 'Real'

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Swartz Creek, MI
    Posts
    889
    Modem, Decipher was kind of handicap to begin with as they got the Trek RPG license so soon after Last Unicorn Games. Many I am sure (as some have had mentioned on this site) Trek roleplayers stuck with the Icon system and did some stay with FASA. At one point, Decipher was trying to buy FASA. So we might have had a revival of that system instead of CODA.

    Prehaps we should let Paramount know that this is a problem that they should try to recitify by getting the CODA system if Decipher ends up being disolved. That way the CODA system would be easliy attached to the Trek RPG License, so at worst the next licensee might dual stat the sourcebooks.
    Member, TrekRPGnet Development Team | OD&D Guild - The Guild for Original (Classic) D&D | FlintGamers |Free Web Hosting

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Kaunakakai, Molokai, Hawaii, USA
    Posts
    4,020
    Quote Originally Posted by spshu
    Modem, Decipher was kind of handicap to begin with as they got the Trek RPG license so soon after Last Unicorn Games. Many I am sure (as some have had mentioned on this site) Trek roleplayers stuck with the Icon system and did some stay with FASA. At one point, Decipher was trying to buy FASA. So we might have had a revival of that system instead of CODA.

    Prehaps we should let Paramount know that this is a problem that they should try to recitify by getting the CODA system if Decipher ends up being disolved. That way the CODA system would be easliy attached to the Trek RPG License, so at worst the next licensee might dual stat the sourcebooks.
    Unless the publisher can acquire Decipher or Decipher willingly relinquish the CODA IP, I doubt the next publisher is going to want to do that. In fact, had that been done for LUG's license, we would not see CODA because that system owe much of its existence from the birth of ICON.
    Anyhoo, just some random thoughts...

    "My philosophy is 'you don't need me to tell you how to play -- I'll just provide some rules and ideas to use and get out of your way.'"
    -- Monte Cook

    "Min/Maxing and munchkinism aren't problems with the game: they're problems with the players."
    -- excerpt from Guardians of Order's Role-Playing Game Manifesto

    A GENERATION KIKAIDA fan

    DISCLAIMER: I Am Not A Lawyer

  10. #85
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Mappin
    Yea, but HD is softcover and 2-color B&W (well, sans 32 pages), meaning they slammed this thing out as cheaply as they could. All the products were laid out with full-color and the beautiful layout seen in the pre-implosion releases. Something of mercy/pity printing.

    I continue to contend there won't be any Trek releases (by Decipher).
    Ah, I'd be fine with a printing like this. There's plenty of good-looking B&W rpg books out there, which they might as well be able to produce, and if they're just going to pull Trek images for the art, its no big loss. Hardcovers are theoretically more durable, but... i've not really found that born out in practice.
    Portfolio | Blog Currently Running: Call of Cthulhu, Star Trek GUMSHOE Currently Playing: DramaSystem, Swords & Wizardry

  11. #86
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    445
    Originally posted by C. Huth
    Ah, I'd be fine with a printing like this. There's plenty of good-looking B&W rpg books out there, which they might as well be able to produce, and if they're just going to pull Trek images for the art, its no big loss. Hardcovers are theoretically more durable, but... i've not really found that born out in practice.
    As would I, C.H., and as would - I suspect - the vast majority of the population here. We'd grumble, shake our heads and grit our teeth about how the damned things aren't as attractive/as durable as the full-gloss printing hardbounds, but we'd buy them. That's the level of starvation we've been reduced to in this hunger strike imposed by outside forces.

    However, Don's point - at least as I'm interpreting it - is that the books are not going to even receive this poor excuse for a public release. I don't know how many magnitudes better the LotR stuff sold than Trek, if at all, but it became apparent very early on (the Narrator's Screen debacle) that Decipher always had Trek on a severe back-burner as compared to Rings. If this throwaway attitude - "Print it on tissues and paper towels; who's to know the difference? Those ankle-biters will have something in their hands to shut them up and let us get back to trying to figure out a new card game" - is the best we can expect for their most profitable RPG property, then Trek doesn't even rate an obituary notice.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    Posts
    2,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Mappin
    Yea, but HD is softcover and 2-color B&W (well, sans 32 pages), meaning they slammed this thing out as cheaply as they could. All the products were laid out with full-color and the beautiful layout seen in the pre-implosion releases. Something of mercy/pity printing.
    Or a copout. I was told they were going to be softcover, but hadn't heard about the lack of color...

    I continue to contend there won't be any Trek releases (by Decipher).
    I agree completely. Kind of a shame, as I was looking forward to seeing Worlds in print. (Though never really expected it to happen after Christian & Owen left...)
    Last edited by Doug Burke; 08-29-2005 at 07:39 AM.
    Former Decipher RPG Net Rep

    "Doug, at the keyboard, his fingers bleeding" (with thanks to Moriarti)

    In D&D3E, Abyssal is not the language of evil vacuum cleaners.

  13. #88
    I would like to meet Warren Holland in person some day.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,548
    Quote Originally Posted by DiceMan
    I would like to meet Warren Holland in person some day.

    Save vs. Desire to throttle!
    "It's hard being an evil genius when everybody else is so stupid" -- Quantum Crook

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •