Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Trohoy: Active protection system..

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    3,462

    Trohoy: Active protection system..

    This looks super cool! http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/t...ble-forcefield almost like a forcefield, I'm gonna have to read up on it!
    Ta Muchly

  2. #2
    It looks more like reactive armor than force field tech, cool none the less.
    Phoenix...

    "I'm not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity,
    but maybe we should just remove all the safety lables and let nature take it's course"

    "A Place For Everything & Nothing In It's Place"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bodenheim, Germany
    Posts
    356
    A quick googel search reveals that the system works like this.

    Sensors guard the vehicle against incoming missiles. Once a missile is detected the system launches a countermeasure device that intercepts the missile detonating it prematurely in the process.
    While good for the vehicle and its crew GD has admittedly problems with collateral damage in urban areas.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    3,462
    Well yes and no - a missile exploding in mid air will ultimatelly cause the least damage - aka the firecracker on your palm or in your clenched fist! Depending on the type of missile, some of them don't actually 'go off' when the countermeasure hits them... and it's hardly the fault of the tank driver, if an enemy missile hits him, that it causes collateral damage! The collateral damage would happen anyway, it's just it's a little firther away from the tank!

    The whole thing reminds me of some of the cooler scenes in BSG, with thousands of bits of flack flying off the ships to stop missiles hitting them. For the forseable future it's more likelly than actual forcefields!
    Ta Muchly

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bodenheim, Germany
    Posts
    356
    Yes i agree, but the whole thing is also to be mounted on APC's and IFV's, and any troops not within the Vehicle could get in the way of any stray shrapnel that flies around. I think its that kind of collateral damage that worries DG the most.

    In theory this "point defense system" certainly increases the survival chances an armored vehicle has on the battlefield

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •