Errata and a Question

[skree]

Has any one noticed that the NX class (Starships p. 76) has it Atmosphere Capable when in the Narrator's Guide (p. 138) describes Atmosphere Capable as starship capable of landing. The NX-class through out Star Trek: Enterprise did not land.

I did a rebuild and taking out Atmosphere Capable on the NX Class gives the ship 2 spaces left.

I think this should have been in the Errata.

[Owen E Oulton]

Not a CODA fan, but Atmospheric Capability should not imply Landing Capable. It should be a prerequisite for landing on any planet with an atmosphere, but Landing Capability should be separate. Logically speaking, that is...

[The Tatterdemalion King]

Yeah, IIRC the Galaxy-class saucer was also 'atmosphere capable' to the extent that it didn't burn up like the Ent-A...

[Meteo]

Not much of a CODA Fan either, but I do things in multiple systems too, and you can e-mail me, meteo at comcast dot com, and I'll help you more, and here:

Atmosphere, but not landing, can be slightly more specific descrribed, with 1 point cost, if I fiddle with more complex things, I can do that.