I thought it raised many valid points, particularly about transhumanism, the technological singularity, cybernetic enhancement and genetic enhancement, all of which Roddenberry got completely wrong. All the arguments cited sources and examples. What parts did you disagree with?

I particularly liked the last sentence from the article.

"So while the future may not look like anything portrayed in Star Trek, that doesn't mean it's going to be any less fantastic and vast. In fact, it may introduce us to some entirely new frontiers."