Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: chain of command discrepancies

  1. #1
    Perrryyy Guest

    chain of command discrepancies

    On TOS, chain of command went from

    Captain
    First Officer/Chief Science Officer
    Doctor
    Chief Engineer

    on TNG it seemed to go

    Captain
    First Officer
    Doctor
    Ops
    Chief Engineer
    Counselor

    Or am I wrong & the ranks just happened to work out that way? Where's the discrepancy (if any)?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,394
    The Ship's Doctor is not in the chain of command per se. He/She can "dismiss" the Captain if given proper medical reasons, however, the Captain can ignore the Doctor's order...Under pain of court martial.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    404
    It is my understanding that 'Chief Engineer' and 'Third Officer' are two different titles shared by one individual. So, Data just happened to be Second Officer, even though he was already Dept Head of the Ops Dept. It does not mean that all Chief of Ops positions gets 2nd officer spot.

    In theory, any branch could hold the 2nd officer spot.

    This is, at least, how I've approached the various positions on my ships.

  4. #4
    Perrryyy Guest
    Originally posted by Anomaly
    It is my understanding that 'Chief Engineer' and 'Third Officer' are two different titles shared by one individual. So, Data just happened to be Second Officer, even though he was already Dept Head of the Ops Dept. It does not mean that all Chief of Ops positions gets 2nd officer spot.

    In theory, any branch could hold the 2nd officer spot.

    This is, at least, how I've approached the various positions on my ships.
    Thanks. Exaclty what I was wondering, & how I'd probably approach it too.

  5. #5
    But what about even higher ranking officers? (such as commodores in TOS, admirals in TNG and beyond) What authority do they have? Can a doctor still remove them from active duty?
    "You have not experienced Shakespeare until you've read it in the original Klingon text."
    - Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

  6. #6
    Perrryyy Guest
    Originally posted by Hirogen Alpha
    But what about even higher ranking officers? What authority do they have? Can a doctor still remove them from active duty?
    I would assume so: Medical prerogative. Crusher practically ordered Picard to Risa, Bashir did something similar to Kira when she was showing signs of stress.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,394
    If the Doctor is of the professional opinion and can prove his findings he can remove any superior officer from his post. Especially if their are other crewman under him who can become injured by the said officers action or in-actions while under those circumstances.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Posts
    2,990
    Chain should run something like this...
    Commanding officer
    Executive Officer
    Operations Officer

    After that it would be based on the rank of line officers. Guys like science officer, medical officer and cheif engineer are not necessarily that high up the chain of command.
    "War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

    John Stuart Mill

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,490
    qerlin is correct. Quite frankly, I thought TNG made a huge mistake as regards military-style protocol when they had the CMO and Counsellor doing turns as Officer of the Watch. For instance, in <i>Disaster</i>, Ro should have been in command rather than Troi (unless they were still in a reality where O'Brien was a Lieutenant, but that's a whole different issue of causality).

    In TOS, Spock held both the XO's position and that of Science Officer - filling two billets. He was not XO because he was Science Officer, he was Science Officer in addition to his position as XO.

  10. #10
    Perrryyy Guest
    Originally posted by qerlin
    Chain should run something like this...
    Commanding officer
    Executive Officer
    Operations Officer

    After that it would be based on the rank of line officers. Guys like science officer, medical officer and cheif engineer are not necessarily that high up the chain of command.
    That was the direction I was leaning too.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    761
    Hrm. I've always had it fairly free-form: ie, there's a Captain, an XO, and then the "2nd Officer," and onward down from there. But the "2nd Officer" isn't really a position all on its own insomuch as it is a title given to the next senior person on the ship.

    That said, in my USS Perseus Campaign, beyond the Captain and the 1st officer (Commander), there's a Full Lieutenant Night Bridge Officer, Command branch, who is basically the one in charge during the night shift. While there are a few people on board who outrank him (ie: the Lt. Commander in Engineering, who is technically the '2nd officer' as well; and Lt. Commander Michael Barratt, the CMO), he's more "senior" during his shift: he would be in charge over the Doctor for sure, and depending on the situation, even the Chief Engineer.

    Basically, it's a situational and plot driven idea to me: though technically it is a Captain, 1st Officer, 2nd Officer progression, there are other command officers, most notably that lieutenant, who, by virtue of being in the Command Track, have a bit more oomph than their rank would would suggest against the rank of a different department...

    Hrm. I'm not sure if I'm making sense. Basically, I figure Command people should be a bit more ahead of the Ops/Engineering/Medical/Science folk...

    The Doc
    So you think, 'Might as well,
    Dance a Tango to Hell,
    at least I'll have Tangoed at all.'
    -- "Rent," Jonathan Larson

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    30
    I thought that in "Disaster" Troi was in command because she had finished Bridge Qualifications or whatever in a previous episode. I remember that being a "wow, they kept to continuity!" sort of shock that surprised people.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,394
    She went for the Bridge Cert. about two months after that occasion. She was in "Command" since she technically held the highest rank on the bridge Lt. Cmdr. In reality Ro should have been in charage, she was only a Lt. but was from command branch and was a watch officer IIRC.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    1,132
    Ro was an Ensign in "Disaster". She didn't get the extra pips until that ep where she joined the Maquis. But yes, technically as a line officer, she should have had perogative over Troi for command.
    "That might have been the biggest mistake of my life..."

    "It is unlikely. I predict there is scope for even greater mistakes in the future given your obvious talent for them."

    Vila and Orac, Blake's Seven

  15. #15
    The way I see and run it is;

    Captain
    XO
    2nd Officer (whichever Department)
    (also roughly equal with Chief of the Boat)
    Line Officer by Department head and then senior rank onwards.
    Other Officers (as above).
    DanG/Darth Gurden
    The Voice of Reason and Sith Lord

    “Putting the FUNK! back into Dysfunctional!”

    Coming soon. The USS Ganymede NCC-80107
    "Ad astrae per scientia" (To the stars through knowledge)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •