Hmm, "continuity pornographer"...
I know a writer who calls it something much more explicit, but in the same vein.
My position is simply that Braga and Berman are actually doing a fairly decent job at a position they cannot possibly be seen to succeed in. If they change too much to suit what they see is needed, they upset the "Roddenberry is god" crowd. Not changing enough will draw accusations of lack of originality from the thinking fans and the critics. It's a very fine line to walk, and IMHO they're just about succeeding.
However, coming out with phrases like this is not going to help him. I can understand his anger (amongst other things, I've seen Joe Stracsynski's response to similar complaints over Babylon 5's fifth season - not to mention the D&D 3E debate), but maybe he needs some Vulcan emotional control training.
Continuity does seem to be a difficult concept for someone raised on episodic tv to deal with, and Trek has about a hundred times as many pitfalls as any other series to deal with. It also has some of the most fundamentalist fans I've seen outside of Dr Who, who are going to jump at every mistake. I did think Braga's original announcement that continuity was irrelevant was a mistake - but then why did they make so much effort over Shadows of P'Jem?
Ok, I'm rambling (lack of sleep will do that to you ), but hopefully you can see my pov...
Jon
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, where the sea is asleep and the rivers dream; people made of smoke and cities made of song.
Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, and somewhere else the tea is getting cold. Come on, Ace, we've got work to do."
THE DOCTOR, "Survival" (Doctor Who)