I had an idea for Leverage, tell me what you guys think.
Levels go from 1 to 10
When two Tzenkethi square off over a issue (or one wants to leverage something over the other), they comapre Leverage numbers.
The difference between the two is the modifier, applied either as a penalty/bonus to the instigator's roll or a bonus/penalty to the defender's Savvy check. Person with the highest leverage chooses.
So TZ1 and TZ2 square off. TZ1 has a leverage of 6 and TZ2 has a leverage of 8. The differnce is 2. TZ2 is the instigator and he feels his dice aren't hot, so he decides to take a +2 bonus to his Savvy check to resist. Now he could have instead given TZ1 a -2 penalty to his skill roll instead.
Originally posted by AslanC I had an idea for Leverage, tell me what you guys think.
Levels go from 1 to 10
When two Tzenkethi square off over a issue (or one wants to leverage something over the other), they comapre Leverage numbers.
The difference between the two is the modifier, applied either as a penalty/bonus to the instigator's roll or a bonus/penalty to the defender's Savvy check. Person with the highest leverage chooses.
So TZ1 and TZ2 square off. TZ1 has a leverage of 6 and TZ2 has a leverage of 8. The differnce is 2. TZ2 is the instigator and he feels his dice aren't hot, so he decides to take a +2 bonus to his Savvy check to resist. Now he could have instead given TZ1 a -2 penalty to his skill roll instead.
Does that make sense?
Yes it does and in theory that should work effectively.
So by resurrecting this thread can I presume you are considering placing the Bonaventure in the middle of all this?
Reply With Quote
