Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Which Starship and Why?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    MetroWest, MA USA
    Posts
    2,590

    Question Which Starship and Why?

    People seem to like these threads such that they pop up from time to time. I'd like to give a little twist to it...

    What starship (or other base) are you using in your game? Why? What else did you consider? How is that choice working out for you?
    AKA Breschau of Livonia (mainly rpg forums)
    Gaming blog 19thlevel

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Germantown, Maryland
    Posts
    1,241
    Startrek: Aurora, Intrepid. I picked the Intrepid here because I wanted to give the players a deep space ship that would be comfortable for long missions. I had three choices here really.

    Galaxy, Soveriegn, Intrepid

    I did not want them being able to destroy every ship that they came across without a challenge. Or resort to guns in every situation. That rules out the Soveriegn completely. It was between a Galaxy and an Intrepid. I did not want there to be over a thousand NPC's onboards. That's why I went with the Intrepid.

    Startrek: Eclipse, Nova class. I wanted a ship that would normally be stationed to a starbase but could go out firther if necessary. This brought me to two conclusions. Defiant or Nova. I wanted the players to be challenged when they have to fight and like the claustrophobic state of the Nova, with a complement of Eighty.


    I tried a Defiant in a one episode and the players ended up starting a war with the Ferengi. They were court marshailed(sp?) and this resulted in the game starting over. I again chose a Nova for the same reasons as above.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    2,923
    I've told myself several times that I need to write up an article answering this question. It won't tell you necessarily, per-se what you have to use, but does run the entire gambit of why you might want to use such a vessel. One day I suppose I'll get around to it.

    Short answer, for a "current" Trek game, balanced ship for all types of mission profiles: Intrepid. Can't beat it, baby.

  4. #4
    The USS Venture was always a Galaxy class from the moment it appeared on screen... And the PBEM has been in existance longer than the LUG RPG.

    However when the game restarted with a rules based system rather than the Freeform game that had been collapsing previously, I thought about a total refresh (Not realising the sort of outcry last seen over the re-imagining of Battlestar Galactica ), and part of that was, for a very short time, thoughts of another ship, a new ship.

    I did for a short while consider the USS Journeyman an Intrepid class ship. The main reason why I didn't, was simply because there were no stats out for it at the time and I was feeling lazy.

    Its worked out well on the whole, and I still have the Journeyman as a backup if a tabletop game ever occurs.
    DanG/Darth Gurden
    The Voice of Reason and Sith Lord

    “Putting the FUNK! back into Dysfunctional!”

    Coming soon. The USS Ganymede NCC-80107
    "Ad astrae per scientia" (To the stars through knowledge)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,394
    Imperial Starbird T'Virik, T'Rasus-class.

    Why? I wanted something that said Romulan in the TNG era, but not something as overwhelmingly powerful as the Warbird. The Starbird classes are the Romulans answer to the Explorer classes the Federation uses.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208
    I've always gone back to the Galaxy-class. With the Tech Manual and the blueprints that were published for it, it's hard to find better source material for any other class ship, save the Constitution refit. Since I run TNG-DS9 era series exclusively, well...

    If a VOY tech manual ever came out, or if I ever manage to come up with a way to make good deckplans myself, I'll stick with either the Galaxy or come up with a new class.

    I tend to do exploration first type of series, so a Galaxy class fits that nicely.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Dover NH, USA
    Posts
    531

    I like deckplans

    I like having deckplans. Lately I've been leaning towards smaller more intimate ships. Thus, I've got the Friday group on a Defiant class and the Monday group on a Saber class. I had some re-ocurring one-shots on a Nova class.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Tyne & Wear
    Posts
    201
    Since the games I was running collapsed recently (half the players, a married couple, moved out of the area) I don't run a game anymore but the next game I'll run soonish will be set on a Miranda class starship, lost in the Delta Quadrant. I wanted a small starship which isn't all that powerful (ruling out the grossly overpowered Intrepid class) so that the crew may have to think there way out of situation, rather than shooting there way out.
    He's an underprivileged skateboarding cowboy with nothing left to lose. She's a sharp-shooting goth bounty hunter who believes she is the reincarnation of an ancient Egyptian queen. They fight crime!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Salinas, Calif., USA (a Chiefs fan in an unholy land)
    Posts
    3,379
    For my Star Trek: TSI campaign, I'm using a 120m-long freighter of my own design. Since the characters are undercover Starfleet Intel agents in 2275, I needed a small, cozy, civilian ship.

    If I ever do a TNG campaign, I'm thinking about the Sequoia-class, simply because it's cool.
    Davy Jones

    "Frightened? My dear, you are looking at a man who has laughed in the face of death, sneered at doom, and chuckled at catastrophe! I was petrified."
    -- The Wizard of Oz

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Kettering,UK
    Posts
    925
    Miranda-class USS Boudicea .

    Why? A good all round ship, but nearly powerful enough to go up against any Dominion vessels, thereby making the players think their way around problems.

    Of course, now they have a fleet of a dozen starships at their command!
    Greg

    "The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had."
    Madworld, Donnie Darko.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Mount Holly NC
    Posts
    751
    I took a cool picture from Ex Asris Scientia of the Bradbury class, and designed a Coda heavy cruiser to go with it. Crew 280, no families on board, not quite as big as a Sovereign class. I like a ship with no preconceived notions about what it can and can't do.
    tmutant

    Founder of the Evil Gamemasters Support Group. No, Really.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    503
    Originally posted by Dan Stack
    What starship (or other base) are you using in your game?
    I chose the USS Asimov. It is an Intrepid Prototype.
    Why?
    I decided to design my own ship to suite my specific GM needs. I like the lines of the Intrepid, but I too think it is a little “too much ship.” What I did was shrink down the Intrepid class to about half its size. I wanted a small ship that I could create the entire NPC list of crewmembers. If the PCs need a Sociologist, they can check the crew roster and see who fits the job best. I also have a small paragraph of background for each of these NPCs, which helps out immensely during our sessions. I guess I just feel that large ships are so impersonal. Plus, on a large ship, you can always find an NPC who would be skilled in any area you could possible need help with. It really helps “PUSH” PC development in that the PCs are trying to fit the bill for any vacancies that may exist do to ineffective staffing (I make the Command PC roll for this). In fact, during our last few sessions, the ship lost about half its crew in a battle. The Command PC requisitioned more crew to replace those lost. We will be roleplaying this during our next session.

    The USS Asimov was built in 2365 as a “demo” to see if the design would function properly. This was primarily done due to the failed computer modeling experiments under various conditions and stresses. The USS Asimov tested successful and was placed in a learning facility at the Daystrom Institute. She was “re-commissioned” in 2375 as a result of the lack of Federation vessels available due to losses in the Dominion War.

    The rational came from my dislike of the “holodecks can simulate most everything” concept. The idea of bio-neural gel packs worked well on paper, but early tests proved ineffective and dangerous. A “privately funded” project was used to build a prototype, in the truest sense of the word, to see if the ship would function. It was built half the scale of the, yet to be built, USS Intrepid so as to be more cost effective.
    What else did you consider?
    I thought about using the Oberth or a few of the smaller canon vessels. In the end, it was way more fun to design my own ship. She is small and has few torpedoes, so the PCs will need to be careful.
    How is that choice working out for you?
    I love it!!! I would like to have some deckplans, so I think I may switch to the Nova. Publius has made some awesome deckplans that I may just have to borrow???

    OR

    Maybe he would help me do some deckplans for my own ship!!!

    Oh, I am just curious. Is Dan Stack going to answer his own questions for us???
    Kronok

    I am dead. As of this moment, we are all dead. We go into battle to reclaim our lives. This we do gladly because we are Jem’Hadar. Remember, victory is life.

    "The D20 System is the heart of the classic fantasy roleplaying experience, the game that has taught us all how to be munchkins. There is no way we could do it with any other system."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Posts
    2,990
    USS Constitution, Galaxy-class. Mostly because everyone knows what the interiors look like & I've got deckplans, etc, if I need them.
    "War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

    John Stuart Mill

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Perth, WA, Australia, Sector 001
    Posts
    301
    Well, for me it was simple ...
    I wanted to start the game with something that a junior captain could/would get as her first command.
    I like the feeling of realism where both the captain and the crew are earning their way up.
    Since I have considered escort vessels to be a station/patrol based I went for the next best thing, a frigate.
    So I took the look and feel of defiant, made it bigger (250m) stacked it with a bit more crew (80+10RRT) then added the intelligence sticker to it, to give a little extra freedom of operation and make players feel a bit more special (this of course tied in with the story and was not pulled out of the backside). And this is how USS Courageous (Avatar class Fast Frigate was created). From now on, the sky is the limit. It is really up to the crew and the captain where it will all go from here.
    Captain Alexandra Polanski
    CO, USS Archangel (flag of 7th Fleet, RRTF operations)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Cartography Heaven, AussieLand
    Posts
    2,482
    My current game is Klingon mercs.

    So one Character has a beatup Bird of Prey D-12 class.

    The other has found a 80yr old crashed K'tinga, and will try to restore it over the campaign.
    ST: Star Charts Guru
    aka: The MapMaker


    <A HREF="http://users.tpg.com.au/dmsigley/sirsig"><IMG SRC=http://users.tpg.com.au/dmsigley/sirsig/images/Southern_Cross.jpg width="100" height="120"></A>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •