Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Star Trek: The Magazine ending publication

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208

    Unhappy Star Trek: The Magazine ending publication

    Sad but true. According to their website, the April 2003 issue will be the last.

    I called them today; anyone who has a subscription over that date will get a refund for the difference.

    It's a shame to see this one go. It's a good magazine with tons of great reference material.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,548
    Goddamn it. ST:TM is the best Star Trek magazine ever.

    What ARE they thinking??
    "It's hard being an evil genius when everybody else is so stupid" -- Quantum Crook

  3. #3
    Perrryyy Guest

    Unhappy

    Shame to see it go, even though I cancelled my subscription last year. (I never really read it, and it was an added drain on my pocketbook, so I decided to cut my losses.)

    I suspect it's my kind of sentiment*, (cancelling subscriptions = less operating $$) that contributed to decision to end publication


    * = I am in no way suggesting that I ended the magazine single-handedly, rather that reduced numbers of subscriptions contributed to the demise of the mag.

  4. #4
    Perrryyy Guest
    What ARE they thinking??
    Not sure, but as I indicated in my post, I'll bet all you have to do is, "follow the money" (or perhaps lack thereof), and you'll find your culprit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208
    Originally posted by Perrryyy
    * = I am in no way suggesting that I ended the magazine single-handedly
    It was you, I know it! The editors were like "Darn it! Perrryyy's cancelled his subscription! No sense going on now!"



    Okay, maybe you're right. Still a shame to see it go. Time to snap up some back issues.

  6. #6
    Perrryyy Guest
    Originally posted by Ineti
    It was you, I know it! The editors were like "Darn it! Perrryyy's cancelled his subscription! No sense going on now!"

    BWAHAHAHHA!!!

    Fear me for I am the Elaysian trickster of doooom!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    1,142

    Not Surprising

    I had to pay $12+ for a single issue up here in the GWN. That's a ridiculous sum for a monthly magazine. I guess many others also felt the same.

    *shrugs*

    May sound cold, but I'm not crying over the fact that it's going to the nether realm.

    Steve
    Drunken DM and the Speak with Dead spell: "No, I'm not the limed-over skeleton of the abbot, and no this special key in my boney fingers does not open the door to the secret treasury! ... Oh crap."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    3,804
    I think it is a sign when "Maid in Manhattan" makes more money than "Nemesis" that the Trek franchise is grinding down. Paramount/Vicaomm and all their subsidiaries have always shown that they have a lack of willingness to spend too much money on Trek.

    DS9 was weakly rated.

    Voyager and Enterprise have been ratings disasters.

    I think it is fair to speculate that perhaps Star Trek needs a vacation... or something to rejuvinate it.

    I will miss the magazine, though I stopped buying it when every issue featured soemthing on Enterprise for about 4 or 5 months in a row (or so it seemed).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Kettering,UK
    Posts
    925
    The Fact Files have finished over here in the UK, too. 304 issues wasn't a bad run though.
    Greg

    "The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had."
    Madworld, Donnie Darko.

  10. #10
    Perrryyy Guest
    I think it is a sign when "Maid in Manhattan" makes more money than "Nemesis" that the Trek franchise is grinding down
    Yeah

    While playing on HSX (Hollywood stock market) I went long on Nemesis @ 22, with the idea that it would make at least as much as the previous movies (which where all in the 20's for the first weekend), especially with all the hype (admittedly, most of it on this board, which is Trek anyhoo, but still...) . It made 19.

    I got my shorts handed to me

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    2,923
    That's too bad, although not entirely unexpected. That was one darn expensive magazine. I let my subscription lapse on purpose.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Waynesburg, PA
    Posts
    1,361
    Well sad to see it go, especially since I was hopeing for the same treatment for the DS9 DVD sets like the TNG ones were getting. At the same time since I paid cover price for every issue since #1 and that the colection was starting to take up way to much shelf space (I just moved the collection downstairs into the basement book dungeon) I can say I am a little happy to see it end now. They have made alot of nice illustrations and I am sure they will be seen again in he Encyclopedia when ever it is reprinted again.

    Maybe Communicator will start to have technical briefings now (both mags were published by the same publisher I think) say maybe one or two an issue would not be too bad.

  13. #13
    This message has been removed on request by the
    poster

  14. #14
    This message has been removed on request by the
    poster

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    3,208
    Originally posted by StyroFoam Man
    All kidding aside. There were no ads in that rag other than the fanboy startrek crap. Now if they had run ads for REAL products then they might have survived.
    IIRC, they did have ads, but it was for weird-ass stuff like "How to be a good small-talker" and that sort of thing. Very weird.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •