[Coda] Narrator's Screen Review

[qerlin]

Originally posted by Jesse Heinig
People who have had issues with the existing character sheets will be happy to know that the sheets included in the <i>Starfleet Operations Manual</i> are no longer in color and have a white background. Hopefully we'll be able to put them up in PDF format for easy printing. (Sadly, couldn't do anything about the small box spaces for specializations -- no room!)

J.H.

Shukran, Jess...

[AllenS]

Originally posted by Jesse Heinig
People who have had issues with the existing character sheets will be happy to know that the sheets included in the <i>Starfleet Operations Manual</i> are no longer in color and have a white background. Hopefully we'll be able to put them up in PDF format for easy printing. (Sadly, couldn't do anything about the small box spaces for specializations -- no room!)

J.H.

Issues isn't really the word...more like seething dislike

still haven't gotten my ref screen yet

Allen

[Calcoran]

Finally got mine! (along with the BtVSRPG core book )

Two minor quibbles I'd say:

• The Narrator's side is a bit dark. Legible, well organized (different colors for each type of table is a nice idea), but why use such a dark background. I don't know about you, but it's often a bit dark where/when we play, and this is not going to make it easy for my poor eyes (it is a usually accepted ergonomic fact that dark fonts on a light background are less stressful to read). Well, minor quibble really, I don't read what's on my part of the screen all <I>that</I> often .
• Matt finish on the player's side ... somehow, the picture is just gorgeous, and I feel the finish do not do it justice. A nice glossy one would have been great ... and maybe more resilient to all those things my players use to throw at me . Mind you, maybe I can do something about it ... any idea about how to make a glossy finish?
• Oh, a third one maybe ... a small scenario instead of those gorgeously useless character sheets would have been a good idea.

That said, I'm rather happy with my purchase: It'll be quite useful and it's really nice to look at (specially compared to these LUG's ... things).

[Scotty]

Which tables are wrong? Where would I find the correct versions?

[Paul Dowsland]

See the original posting in this thread - comments near the end about "non-errata'd versions". I'm assuming the versions in the errata strands on this site are the corrected versions.