Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Enterprise's "Bounty" more errors for ratings?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Staten Island, NY
    Posts
    58

    Enterprise's "Bounty" more errors for ratings?

    Sorry, but I gotta vent.

    From TrekToday:

    After contracting a virus on an away mission, T'Pol begins to prematurely experience severe symptoms of Pon Farr, the Vulcan mating cycle in which she has to mate or else die. She begins to make advances on Phlox as well as Reed in her burning desire to mate, forcing the crew to find a solution. Meanwhile, Archer is kidnapped by a bounty hunter who has been hired by the Klingons to bring him back to their planet where a bounty has been put on his head for escaping from their prison (from the "Judgment" episode).



    Here we go agin. Hot Vulcan Babe™ + "in your face" sexual hijinx = ratings?

    I thought only Vulcan MALES experienced the Pon Farr - it appeared to me T'Pring seemed in perfect control of herself when Spock entered the pon farr in "Amok Time", and they were supposed to be joined together.
    Last edited by Mijoro; 04-09-2003 at 11:23 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    680

    Re: Enterprise's "The Expanse" more errors for ratings?

    Either you or this site is getting the episodes mixed up. This is "Bounty," being shown in two weeks, not "The Expanse." (the latter is the season finale.)

    And as for T'pol's thing, have they ever actually said in the shows that it's only for Vulcan males? And the obvious solution is: if it bothers you that much, just don't watch it. It's as simple as that.

    But I agree, it is kind of a stupid marketing trick.
    "Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens."

    -Gimli, son of Gloin (The Fellowship of the Ring)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    3,804
    Isn't it in Star Trek III where Savvik says it?

    Or was it in the actual TOS Ep Amok Time?

    I was always lead to believe it was only the males and then Peter David changed it with Selar.

    Any of the Trek experts know?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,011
    I certainly don't consider myself an expert but I also believed that only Vulcan males experienced Pon Farr, especially after having seen Amok Time.
    If howerver both sexes undergo the cycle then the Vulcan tradition of arranged marriages would make sense. That way you can be sure that your offspring has a receptive partner when his or her time comes. Either only children of similar age have been selected to marry in the future or their cycles are synchronized during the process. If really females have Pon Farr, too, then arranged marriages might have been what helped the Vulcan race to survive.

    "Oh, I'm sorry darling. I'm not in the mood, today. What about in three years."
    “Worried? I’m scared to death. But I’ll be damned if I’m going to let them change the way I live my life.” - Joseph Sisko - Paradise Lost

  5. #5
    Yep. As far as I had always been aware the Ponn Far was a male initiated thing. However, Voyager showed that once a male undergoes Ponn Far and begins the initiation of mating with the female, that said female also begins to exhibit symptons of the Blood Fever.

    So while T'Pring was fully in control when she manipulated Spock, it is not out of bounds for her to really loose control and get into the 'Wild Thing' when things got close and personal .

    Also, Peter David did at least use similar logic with Selar, with the Vulcan doc's ponn far delayed due to Psychic Shock after the death of her mate during mating and melding... So we can forgive him that too.

    And this episode at least has an external reason that quite magically begins the process...

    So while it is, unarguably a cheap marketing ploy, it is not entirely out of bounds or outside of 'Trek' reasoning which has been shown to do almost anything in the past...

    At the end of the day, its about as neutral as you can get, not directly contradicting any Trek Canon, while simaltaneously giving extra ammunition to the Voyager, Peter David and Enterprise critics... As they say, you cant please all of the people all of the time... So if your not pleased, turn off the TV and read a book or something...
    DanG/Darth Gurden
    The Voice of Reason and Sith Lord

    “Putting the FUNK! back into Dysfunctional!”

    Coming soon. The USS Ganymede NCC-80107
    "Ad astrae per scientia" (To the stars through knowledge)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Staten Island, NY
    Posts
    58

    Re: Re: Enterprise's "The Expanse" more errors for ratings?

    Originally posted by erhershman
    Either you or this site is getting the episodes mixed up. This is "Bounty," being shown in two weeks, not "The Expanse." (the latter is the season finale.)
    You are correct, sir! (post edited.) As for not watching the ep: I haven't felt the need to see a season 2 ep so far, and I don't think that's going to change. Of course, your mileage may vary.

    Without starting another new vs. old thread, I guess what really irks me is the reliance on "cheap marketing ploys" (thanks, Dan) to sell a Trek episode. I realize it's all about the ratings, but I'd like to have seen Trek take the high road. "Burning desire to mate" indeed.

    Like I said - I just gotta vent.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    680

    Re: Re: Re: Enterprise's "The Expanse" more errors for ratings?

    Originally posted by Mijoro
    Of course, your mileage may vary.
    It does indeed. I've seen every single ENT episode so far (I don't watch the reruns though.)

    Which tells you I absolutely hate Enterprise, right?
    "Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens."

    -Gimli, son of Gloin (The Fellowship of the Ring)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Posts
    2,990
    (shrug) I f they do it right, why not?

    Our campaign's always had both sexes go through ponn far -- though I always kinda figured the mating fever thing was more a build up due to the repressed emotions thing; creates a hormonal imbalance as they keep their drives bottled up then POP they bust out and gotta **** something. (Personally, I figured the ponn far cycle could vary in length due to your self-control & maybe there might be variation due to the hormonal patterns of the particular gender...)

    But that's just me...
    "War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

    John Stuart Mill

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Manhasset NY
    Posts
    427
    It isn't only males. Read the Vulcan's Heart book series.
    -Chris Barnes
    Visit FBR!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    680
    Originally posted by qerlin
    (shrug) I f they do it right, why not?

    Our campaign's always had both sexes go through ponn far -- though I always kinda figured the mating fever thing was more a build up due to the repressed emotions thing; creates a hormonal imbalance as they keep their drives bottled up then POP they bust out and gotta **** something. (Personally, I figured the ponn far cycle could vary in length due to your self-control & maybe there might be variation due to the hormonal patterns of the particular gender...)

    But that's just me...
    I agree. And anyway, even if they have said in a movie or episode somewhere that it was only Vulcan males, I treat all Trek episodes and movies, from any of the five series, as having the following disclaimer before each episode.

    ALL INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

    It works wonders for getting over canon "changes" (and I use that word in its broadest possible sense, since I don't consider any of Trek to be truly set in stone.)

    Originally posted by Rayaru
    It's isn't only Vulcan males, read the Vulcan's Heart book series.
    I didn't think it was. But regardless of whether it's males or both males and females, it is still kind of a cheap marketing trick. Although IMO T'pol is a cheap marketing trick in and of herself, even when not experiencing a Vulcan sex drive. I think it was Berman who commented in an interview, when asked whether T'pol would experience ponn farr, said that they would do that "if they needed to boost ratings." Which, to met, translates as "it's only a matter of time." And what do you know?

    I'll be fine with the episode so long as she keeps her clothes on. Her "silhouette undressing" thing in "Carbon Creek" was just stupid, and I won't rehash what everyone has already said about the decon scene in "Broken Bow."

    Originally posted by Dan Gurden
    So if your not pleased, turn off the TV and read a book or something...
    True enough.

    So long as it's not a Star Trek book... those are notorious for being inconsistent with the show. In a TNG novel, Tasha's homeworld was a colony called New Paris.
    Last edited by erhershman; 04-09-2003 at 02:42 PM.
    "Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens."

    -Gimli, son of Gloin (The Fellowship of the Ring)

  11. #11
    This message has been removed on request by the
    poster

  12. #12
    This message has been removed on request by the
    poster

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Posts
    2,990
    Originally posted by Liz Not Beth
    Burning Desire To Mate?!

    What's wrong with that??!!??!!
    Yeah, but see...Vulcan do it every seven year, not every seven seconds...
    "War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

    John Stuart Mill

  14. #14
    This message has been removed on request by the
    poster

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Canonsburg, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,548
    Truly.


    First "been feeling like a Vulcan myself, lately" of Two
    "It's hard being an evil genius when everybody else is so stupid" -- Quantum Crook

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •