Originally posted by fat buddha
The first movie didn't give Frodo much of a chance to show his bravery.
But was that really necessary?
Don't you get an equally interesting, albeit slightly different development arc for Frodo by not establishing him as a dormant bad-ass?
It's a change that might be unnecessary to some, but I don't feel as if it hurts the over-all story. Therefore, no harm done, IMO.
No power in the 'verse can stop me.
"You know this roleplaying thing is awfully silly, let's just roll the dice." - overheard during a D&D 3E game.